Elon Musk made a few of his boldest claims but regarding the way forward for synthetic intelligence (AI) throughout an interview with CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin.
During a wide-ranging interview, Musk responded to questions regarding current lawsuits levied towards a few of the billionaire’s opponents within the AI house associated to alleged copyright infringement.
Related: Elon Musk launches AI chatbot ‘Grok,’ says it can outperform ChatGPT
“So, you think it’s a lie,” Sorkin requested Musk throughout the interview, “when OpenAI says that… none of these guys say that they’re training on copyrighted data.”
Musk’s response, “Yeah, that’s a lie.”
Elon Musk’s digital god
It’s unclear what Sorkin meant by his question, as OpenAI has testified in courtroom to the impact that it does practice fashions on copyrighted materials. It is the corporate’s stance, nonetheless, that doing so constitutes “fair use” below United States legislation.
Under additional prodding from Sorkin, Musk dismissed the efficacy of the lawsuits by claiming {that a} “digital god” would make the copyright lawsuits irrelevant:
“I don’t know, except to say that by the time these lawsuits are decided, we’ll have digital god. So, you can ask digital god at that point. Um. These lawsuits won’t be decided on a timeframe that’s relevant.”
Artificial basic intelligence
Assuming that Musk is referring to a digital god showing throughout the subsequent three to 5 years, the typical time it takes for a category motion lawsuit to conclude, this means that the mogul believes that such an entity just isn’t solely imminent however will have powers far past human management.
Musk has, up to now, claimed that Google co-founder Larry Page needed to construct a “digital god,” and he’s told each Meta AI boss Yann LeCun and United Kingdom Prime Minister Rishi Sunak that “our digital god is a .CSV file.”
Our digital god will be within the type of a csv file
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 25, 2023
It seems Musk is referencing the concept of a superhuman intelligence, normally known as an “artificial general intelligence,” or AGI. While there’s no normal accepted definition of an AGI, it stands to purpose that an entity able to rendering the U.S. courtroom system irrelevant in a matter of three to 5 years would sufficiently qualify as an AGI assemble. And, arguably, such an entity could be effectively past human management.
Musk beforehand predicted that AGI would arrive earlier than 2030, an estimate many business consultants disputed as overly optimistic.
New York University professor and best-selling creator of Rebooting AI Gary Marcus and a bunch of different AI consultants challenged Musk to a $500,000 guess on the matter, with the proceeds to go to charity, with their place being that AI wouldn’t arrive by 2030. Musk has, thus far, declined to reply to the provide.
Related: ChatGPT’s first year marked by existential fear, lawsuits and boardroom drama
