Luxury actual property, political donations, investments and journal covers. One yr in the past, that was the lifetime of Sam Bankman-Fried, Assistant United States Attorney Thane Rehn remarked in the course of the opening statements of the world’s most well-known crypto trial.
“All of it was built on lies,” Rehn continued, claiming that the co-founder of Alameda Research and FTX “lied to the world” to get richer and improve affect by lobbying in Washington, D.C. Rehn’s assertion apparently affected even Bankman-Fried’s protection counsel, who responded with a lukewarm comment. His lawyer, Mark Cohen, portrayed his shopper as an entrepreneur who made errors throughout occasions of accelerated development. “There was no theft,” he instructed jurors.
In the gallery, amongst journalists and attorneys, have been Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried, the defendant’s mother and father. While Joseph often smiled over the previous few days, Barbara gazed at her son in the courtroom for hours.
This week, 4 witnesses testified in the trial on the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Manhattan. The checklist features a French dealer, an FTX investor, in addition to Adam Yedidia and Gary Wang — former shut pals of Bankman-Fried.
Cointelegraph is covering Sam Bankman-Fried’s trial on the bottom.
Marc Julliard
The prosecutor’s first witness was a cocoa dealer from Paris, presently dwelling in London. Marc Julliard was one of many victims of the FTX debacle in November 2022. Juilliard instructed jurors he had 4 Bitcoin (BTC) on FTX, price practically $100,000 on the time. He recalled feeling anxious after making an attempt to withdraw funds with out receiving a return.
On FTX, he by no means traded futures, and his Bitcoin was a considerable a part of Julliard’s financial savings. Prosecutors used his testimony for example how clients who trusted funds with FTX had been harmed for the reason that alternate collapsed in 2022.
Bankman-Fried’s protection tried to downplay prosecutors’ arguments, saying that the dealer was a licensed skilled in London who didn’t make choices based mostly on celeb endorsements. Cohen famous nothing was improper with hiring Tom Brady to run an advert for FTX.
Adam Yedidia
Yedidia and Bankman-Fried turned pals on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Before becoming a member of FTX as a developer in January 2021, Yedidia briefly labored at Alameda in 2017 as an intern. He was additionally one of many residents in FTX’s $35 million luxurious property in the Bahamas.
According to his testimony, fiat funds from clients have been obtained by FTX by way of an Alameda subsidiary known as North Dimension. Every deposit made by an FTX buyer was thought-about a debt owed from Alameda to FTX. At the time of the alternate’s collapse, this legal responsibility stood at $8 billion.
Yedidia discovered concerning the billionaire debt between the businesses months earlier than its chapter submitting. “Are things okay?” Yedidia requested Bankman-Fried in a paddle tennis court, mentioning Alameda’s legal responsibility. He didn’t obtain a optimistic response. “We are not bulletproof anymore,” Bankman-Fried instructed him, including that it could take the businesses six months to 3 years to settle their accounts. “He looked nervous,” Yedidia recalled.
Until November’s collapse, Yedidia noticed FTX taking up its rivals, Binance and Coinbase. He even spent his millionaire bonus to amass a 5% stake in the agency.
“I trusted Sam and Caroline and others in Alameda to deal with the state of affairs.“
Yedidia resigned in November 2022 after studying that Alameda was utilizing the funds despatched from FTX clients to repay its money owed. He has been cooperating with the U.S. Department of Justice since 2022.
Matthew Huang
Matthew Huang, co-founder of enterprise capital agency Paradigm, invested $278 million in FTX in two funding rounds between 2021 and 2022. For him, it was an entire loss.
According to Huang, the agency was unaware of the commingling of funds between FTX and Alameda, nor Alameda’s privileges with the crypto alternate. Alameda was exempt from the FTX liquidation engine, which closes positions prone to liquidation, as proven by items of proof introduced by prosecutors from the FTX code and database.
Under the exemption, Alameda might leverage its place and keep a adverse steadiness with FTX.
Huang admitted not conducting deeper due diligence on FTX, as a substitute relying on the data supplied by Bankman-Fried.
Day 3 of the #SBF trial, we’re right here brilliant and early! ☀️ pic.twitter.com/PQ1rQV38Px
— Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) October 5, 2023
In Huang’s phrases, Bankman-Fried was “very resistant” to having traders on FTX’s board of administrators however pledged to construct one and appoint skilled executives.
Gary Wang
Once co-founders of two outstanding corporations, Wang and Bankman-Fried discovered themselves on reverse sides of the courtroom this week. “I’m here because I committed wire fraud, securities fraud and commodities fraud,” Wang instructed jurors, including that he had additionally engaged in conspiracy alongside Bankman-Fried, former Alameda CEO Caroline Ellison and Nishad Singh, the previous director of engineering at FTX.
“I’m here because I committed wire fraud, securities fraud and commodities fraud.“
Wang is considered a key witness in the case. His examination by prosecutors started on Oct. 5 and should conclude on Oct. 10 as the second week of the trial begins. Wang offered a deeper look at how FTX and Alameda operated under Bankman-Fried’s direction.
In 2019, a few months after FTX was founded, Alameda was granted special privileges on FTX code, said Wang. Based on screenshots of the FTX database and code on GitHub, prosecutors showed Alameda had an unlimited negative balance, a $65 billion special line of credit and an exemption from liquidation.
Bankman-Fried’s defense counsel argued that these privileges were similar to ones received by other market makers on FTX. The defense also pointed to the fact that Alameda was the primary market maker on FTX; thus, having the ability to have a negative balance was essential for its role.
According to Wang, the commingling of funds between the companies grew over time. In 2020, Bankman-Fried instructed Wang to keep Alameda’s negative balance under FTX revenue. Alameda’s negative balance rose, as did its credit line with FTX. The liability of Alameda for FTX peaked at $3 billion in late 2021 from $300 million in 2020.
“I trusted his judgment,” Wang replied when requested why he supported Alameda’s privileges.
Prosecutors additionally highlighted the MobileCoin exploit in 2021. To conceal the loss from FTX traders, Bankman-Fried allegedly instructed Wang and Ellison so as to add the deficit to Alameda’s steadiness sheet as a substitute of conserving it on FTX financials.
Another key revelation was that the FTX insurance coverage fund had manipulated information, stated Wang.
In the months earlier than FTX’s collapse, Bankman-Fried, Wang and Singh mentioned the opportunity of shutting down Alameda and changing it with different market makers. At the time, nonetheless, the corporate’s liabilities to FTX stood at $14 billion. In November 2022, Alameda ceased operations.
Wang can also be cooperating with prosecutors. His testimony will resume on Oct. 10, together with Ellison.
Magazine: Blockchain detectives — Mt. Gox collapse saw birth of Chainalysis
