Early cypherpunk Adam Back, cited by Satoshi Nakamoto within the Bitcoin white paper, steered that quantum computing stress could reveal whether or not the blockchain’s pseudonymous creator is alive.
During an interview after a Q&A session on the “Satoshi Spritz” occasion in Turin on April 18, Back steered that quantum computing could pressure Nakamoto to transfer their Bitcoin (BTC). That’s as a result of, in accordance to Back, Bitcoin holders might be pressured to transfer their property to newer, quantum-resistant signature-based addresses.
Back stated that present quantum computers do not pose a credible threat to Bitcoin’s cryptography however will likely threaten it sooner or later. Back estimated that quantum computers could evolve to that extent in “perhaps 20 years.”
Related: Bitcoin’s quantum-resistant hard fork is inevitable — It’s the only chance to fix node incentives
When the risk turns into actual, Back stated the Bitcoin neighborhood can have to select between deprecating outdated, susceptible addresses or letting these funds be stolen:
“If the quantum computers are right here, and folks at universities and analysis labs have entry, the community has a selection to both let individuals steal them or to freeze them — to deprecate the signature.“
Back expects the neighborhood to go together with the previous choice, forcing Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator to transfer their funds if they need to keep away from shedding them.
Privacy upgrades may complicate proof
Still, Back stated that whether or not such a scenario will reveal if Satoshi Nakamoto is alive additionally is dependent upon Bitcoin’s future privateness options.
“It relies upon a bit on the expertise, there are some analysis concepts that would add privateness to Bitcoin,” Back stated. “So, probably there may be a manner to repair quantum points whereas maintaining privateness.“
Related: Lawyer sues US Homeland Dept to probe supposed Satoshi Nakamoto meeting
Still, not everybody is satisfied that — privateness enhancements or not — such a state of affairs would reveal whether or not Nakamoto was alive. An nameless early Bitcoin miner and member of the Bitcoin neighborhood informed Cointelegraph that he doesn’t anticipate Nakamoto’s cash to be moved:
“Even if he is alive and holds the non-public keys, I don’t suppose he’d transfer them. Based on how he acted to date I’d slightly anticipate him to let the neighborhood to resolve.”
He added that, since this is a controversial selection, it is sensible to let the neighborhood resolve. He stated that he’d be stunned if Nakamoto got here out of the woodwork to transfer the property.
A quantum-resistant Bitcoin
Back defined that almost all quantum-resistant signature implementations are both unproven by way of safety or very costly from an information perspective. He cited Lamport signatures as an outdated and confirmed design, however identified that they weigh tens of kilobytes.
Consequently, he steered that Bitcoin ought to be ready to change to quantum-resistant signatures however solely accomplish that when crucial. He steered a Bitcoin taproot-based implementation permitting addresses to change to quantum-resistant signatures when wanted.
Magazine: Bitcoin vs. the quantum computer threat: Timeline and solutions (2025–2035)
