Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin’s weblog put up highlighting the threats he sees artificial intelligence (AI) might pose to humanity has attracted many fiery responses from AI and blockchain community members.
On Nov. 27, Buterin revealed a weblog put up titled My techno-optimism, which mentioned how AI is “fundamentally different” from different innovations like weapons, airplanes, and social media. Furthermore, Buterin defined that it might develop a brand new type of “mind,” which might work towards people and become the new apex species.
The weblog put up attracted discussions on varied fronts and sparked completely different sentiments on X (previously Twitter). Some voiced their settlement with the Ethereum founder, whereas others shared their criticisms of the put up.
An X account known as Emergent Perspective, which focuses on occasions within the web age, replied that they agree with Buterin’s ideas on the weblog put up. According to the X consumer, individuals who argue that constructive intentions can assure that AI “cannot harm” scare them. “That has been true of absolutely nothing in human history, and this will not be the first exception,” they added.
I’m with @VitalikButerin on this one.
The solely folks whose opinions on #AI scare me are the individuals who argue that “Positive Intentions = assure that AI can do no hurt.”
That has been true of completely nothing in human historical past, and this won’t be the primary exception. https://t.co/BVGwPjIbMg
— Emergent Perspective (@_emergent_) November 27, 2023
Another X consumer expressed different worries about AI. A community member who goes as “Wei Dai” on X stated that one in all their issues is that AI may inherently disfavor protection, decentralization, and democracy. According to the consumer, AI might speed up the “wrong intellectual fields,” and people pushing towards it may not be sufficient.
Related: How decentralization can mitigate ‘dystopic’ artificial intelligence risks — SingularityNET exec
Not everybody agreed with Buterin’s sentiment. Another community member criticized Buterin and claimed that expertise specialists like Buterin “seem to have a complete disregard or immature view” of human psychology. The community member argued that the motivation behind constructing “morally poor” human experiences is all the time cash. The X consumer urged the community to grasp each issues and other people and never only one or the opposite.
the issue with Vitalik’s put up imo:
he has a predefined concept of ‘humanitarian values’
however i dont assume these are a priori
i consider the values come after and with the techcfr horse-carriage riders when the motorcar made its intro
usually i believe he is a gud man tho https://t.co/6ZWjWT9fdZ
— 0xBlixa (@0xBlixa) November 28, 2023
Meanwhile, a community member additionally argued on X that one of many issues with the weblog put up is Buterin’s predefined concept of humanitarian values. The community member defined that these shouldn’t be predefined and should come after and with the expertise.
While many expressed their settlement and disagreements, others merely sat on the fence, saying they look ahead to participating in humanity’s collective effort to seek out the solutions.
Magazine: Real AI use cases in crypto, No. 1: The best money for AI is crypto
