The Nature science journal just lately published an editorial in its Nature biotechnology part lauding decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) as a revolutionary new technique by which researchers working in underfunded scientific fields can create communities round their work and elevate funding that, in any other case, may not be obtainable.
In a DAO-based analysis scheme, a mission’s group, fundraising, suggestions, and pipeline from discovery to product/trade can all be dealt with by the identical decentralized governing physique.
Per the Nature article, the final workflow would even be streamlined in comparison with the established order:
“Project proposals are sent to the DAO, and each DAO member is able to vote on whether a particular project should be funded. Members have tokens … to provide support and feedback to new project proposals. Research results are also provided to the DAO as projects continue, leading to further feedback and engagement. Eventually, the project will (hopefully) end up in an IP-NFT (intellectual property non-fungible token) — something like a patent, which is owned by the DAO and governed by all token holders.”
Funding can differ wildly from one scientific endeavor to a different. During increase and bust intervals, analysis into areas corresponding to synthetic intelligence and quantum computing would possibly obtain enormous boons from Big Tech, authorities and follow-on buyers, whereas sectors that will have been well-funded beforehand, corresponding to longevity and these which were historically underfunded, like girls’s well being points, for instance, could find funding more and more tough to secure.
DAOs are constructed on blockchain know-how. This permits a DAO to perform on a digital ledger that’s clear and decentralized, that means a single entity or establishment doesn’t management it. In the science world, this enables mission funding and neighborhood interplay can be democratized.
Related: DAOs need to learn from Burning Man for mainstream adoption
Traditionally, scientists working at or with essentially the most prestigious establishments — main universities in international locations with excessive GDPs, authorities establishments and contractors, Big Tech and large pharma firms — obtain essentially the most funding and entry essentially the most potential funding.
The distinction is essential as a result of, as scientists depart geographical areas with much less funding to pursue analysis in wealthier areas, the “brain drain” related to emigration is compounded.
And, as a result of DAOs don’t essentially must respect borders (although the legalities surrounding their operation can differ by location), they can be ruled by the wants and needs of the analysis scientists, not the nation, college or firm sponsoring it.
Ultimately, the Nature editorial workers concludes that DAOs might turn into an important platform for underfunded researchers, however adoption would require additional schooling.
“Part of this challenge is helping possible members realize that the DAO is not just a funding body,” the workers writes, “but also a community of people who care strongly about supporting a particular scientific cause.”
