Bitget and crypto influencer embroiled in legal saga after Reel Star token listing fiasco


Update (Aug. 18 at 2:09 pm UTC): This article has been up to date with either side’ views and extra info. Further commentaries are anticipated from either side.

Crypto influencer Evan Luthra has introduced a lawsuit towards crypto change Bitget for freezing his account after a brand new token listing in March. According to Luthra, the change suspended his withdrawals and froze $200,000 in Tether (USDT) whereas makes an attempt to hunt clarification went unanswered. 

Luthra’s involvement with the Reel Star challenge serves as a backdrop to those occasions. The influencer was employed as an adviser to Reel Star, a startup growing a social media app for creators. As compensation, Luthra was supplied Reel Token (REELT), the challenge’s utility token. Upon its listing, the influencer offered 1.3 million REELT tokens on Bitget. Luthra’s account was then frozen beneath suspicion of market manipulation. Regarding the choice, a spokesperson from Bitget informed Cointelegraph:

“Bitget confronted a manipulative assault by a bunch of merchants making an attempt to revenue by manipulating trades on the change. Their goal was a brand new coin known as REELT, which they tried to dump instantly after its listing on Bitget, inflicting a big drop in the coin’s value.“

Additionally, Bitget claims to have contacted the crypto influencer for a proof: “In response, he admitted to promoting the tokens. However, once we requested for the explanations behind this irregular habits, we didn’t obtain energetic suggestions or passable response.“

Luthra claims innocence, citing Reel Star co-founder Navdeep Sharma’s alleged approval of his token sale plans. The influencer now seeks a considerable $16 million in damages, together with the $200,000 held in his account. His lawsuit encompasses Bitget, Foresight Ventures and key executives.

“Bitget prevented me, a fully KYCed [Know Your Customer] user of their platform, from withdrawing my tokens,” Luthra said to Cointelegraph, including:

“After I sold this portion of my allocated tokens, my funds —including the crypto […] I already had on the exchange before REELT — were blocked, and the company stole what my tokens were worth for themselves.“

According to Gracy Chen, Bitget’s managing director, the exchange previously announced an investigation into the case, disclosing the findings weeks later along with a compensation plan for more than 500 clients using both the company’s own funds and funds from frozen transactions.

“At Bitget, user protection is our top priority. When we detect any illegal or fraudulent behaviors on our platform, we take immediate action,” she wrote in a publish on Aug. 4, saying the change had not been notified of the lawsuit at the moment.

In response to Chen, Luthra famous that he was simply an “ordinary user who received the tokens as compensation for a consultation” and shouldn’t be thought-about a part of the challenge crew. 

In a weblog publish, Bitget issued a response to the occasion and mentioned it was in communication with Luthra shortly after the occasion occurred. The change defined the reasoning behind its actions: “After our investigation, we imagine the account talked about has been concerned in suspicious buying and selling behaviors on Bitget.“ 

Bitget weblog publish excerpt. Source: Bitget

On X (previously Twitter), crypto neighborhood members expressed combined reactions to the lawsuit. While a few of Luthra’s supporters observed that the case exposes widespread points confronted by customers of centralized crypto exchanges, others claimed in any other case, saying Bitget acted appropriately by defending its customers.

Several distinguished figures from the crypto neighborhood jumped in to have their say on the matter, together with Changpeng Zhao, the CEO of Binance. 

Magazine: Deposit risk: What do crypto exchanges really do with your money?